| Followers | 1 |
| Posts | 65 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 08/14/2008 |
Thursday, September 11, 2008 4:30:20 PM
ThSeeker,
First, as StockDawg pointed out, GSPG is actually traded on the OTCBB, not the Pink Sheets. For those reading who aren't aware, this is an important distinction since it shows their committment to file with the SEC and stay current in keeping investors informed. But more to your point, you're correct that very small companies like GSPG can have a difficult time "keeping their gains" after news-based ramp-ups. If you want to be on the safe side, you can always sell a portion of your position after a news announcement, which is obviously very common since "sell on the news" is a self-fulfilling phenomenon. These are the "you never go broke taking a profit" folks, and I certainly don't fault them for that logic. Like you, I won't be surpised to see a run-up to Tuesday and a slight pull-back afterwards.
As far as resources vs reserves, I was also originally under the impression (from the conference call) that we would be getting the reserves report, but somewhere along the way I noticed that they switched their PR language to resources. It is what's in writing that counts, so I would imagine that everyone is now on the same page and waiting on the resource report, not reserves.
To be fair, they are using a cut-off grade number for this resources report that is fairly conservative, so I wouldn't imagine that the reserves report for this section of their property would be too far off the mark. Also, to develop a reserves report, I'd imagine that they'd also have to do a lot of feasibility studies and technology try-outs to confirm recoverability, and at this point, I'd rather they focus their time/money on mapping the remaining 90% of the land. I'll take 43-101 resource reports on 100% of their land anyday versus time-consuming (and double the effort working through the same set of drill results) 43-101 reserve reports on 25%-50%.
My opinion is that GSPG is simply trying to put together a fully-explored "land package" (to borrow a phrase from the conference call) to sell to a major, and that major will have their own methods of feasibility and technology to determine recoverability numbers. I'd imagine that they would prefer the raw data on the ore in the ground instead of the "operations plan" of a small mining company.
First, as StockDawg pointed out, GSPG is actually traded on the OTCBB, not the Pink Sheets. For those reading who aren't aware, this is an important distinction since it shows their committment to file with the SEC and stay current in keeping investors informed. But more to your point, you're correct that very small companies like GSPG can have a difficult time "keeping their gains" after news-based ramp-ups. If you want to be on the safe side, you can always sell a portion of your position after a news announcement, which is obviously very common since "sell on the news" is a self-fulfilling phenomenon. These are the "you never go broke taking a profit" folks, and I certainly don't fault them for that logic. Like you, I won't be surpised to see a run-up to Tuesday and a slight pull-back afterwards.
As far as resources vs reserves, I was also originally under the impression (from the conference call) that we would be getting the reserves report, but somewhere along the way I noticed that they switched their PR language to resources. It is what's in writing that counts, so I would imagine that everyone is now on the same page and waiting on the resource report, not reserves.
To be fair, they are using a cut-off grade number for this resources report that is fairly conservative, so I wouldn't imagine that the reserves report for this section of their property would be too far off the mark. Also, to develop a reserves report, I'd imagine that they'd also have to do a lot of feasibility studies and technology try-outs to confirm recoverability, and at this point, I'd rather they focus their time/money on mapping the remaining 90% of the land. I'll take 43-101 resource reports on 100% of their land anyday versus time-consuming (and double the effort working through the same set of drill results) 43-101 reserve reports on 25%-50%.
My opinion is that GSPG is simply trying to put together a fully-explored "land package" (to borrow a phrase from the conference call) to sell to a major, and that major will have their own methods of feasibility and technology to determine recoverability numbers. I'd imagine that they would prefer the raw data on the ore in the ground instead of the "operations plan" of a small mining company.
Recent LODE News
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/08/2026 08:21:21 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/08/2026 08:20:50 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/08/2026 08:20:28 PM
- Form 3 - Initial statement of beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/06/2026 08:17:15 PM
- Form 3 - Initial statement of beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 08:16:19 PM
- Form 4/A - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 10:07:58 AM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/01/2026 08:21:04 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/01/2026 08:16:14 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/01/2026 08:15:31 PM
- Comstock Inc. Announces 2026 Annual Meeting • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/26/2026 10:15:00 AM
- Form SCHEDULE 13D - General Statement of Acquisition of Beneficial Ownership • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/25/2026 08:26:52 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/25/2026 08:16:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/25/2026 08:06:02 PM
- Comstock to Participate in the Lytham Partners 2026 Industrials & Basic Materials Investor Summit on April 1, 2026 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/25/2026 10:15:00 AM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/24/2026 08:06:10 PM
- Comstock Inc. Appoints Three New Independent Directors as Company Accelerates Growth in Solar Recycling and Critical Metals Recovery • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/24/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Comstock Announces Full Year 2025 Achievements and Results • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/24/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Comstock Inc. to Host Q4 2025 Earnings Call and Business Update • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/16/2026 08:15:00 PM
- iAccess Alpha Virtual Best Ideas Spring Investment Conference 2026 • ACCESS Newswire • 03/04/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Comstock Metals Advances Industry-scale Facility Commissioning • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/03/2026 03:51:27 PM
- Comstock Metals Receives DTSC Recycling Approval for California Facility; Strengthening National Recycling Network and Major Market Reach • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/23/2026 11:15:00 AM
- Comstock Inc. Featured on Water Tower Research Small-Cap Spotlight Podcast • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/11/2026 01:10:49 PM
- Comstock Metals Awarded Tax Abatement From the Nevada Governor’s Office of Economic Development • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/09/2026 11:15:00 AM
- Form SCHEDULE 13G - Statement of Beneficial Ownership by Certain Investors • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/05/2026 09:00:13 PM
