How is it reckless to put out what I know and have learned through my contacts. Afterall, isn't that exactly what others on either board have done? The fact that some on each board don't like the posts don't make them wrong in any way. Tell me again how it's reckless to post that Quincey Moaning, the CEO and President of BLDV is under investigation when he is, and how it's wrong to bring to light how there may have been a possible glitch in the CCMJ R/M. As I said in the post for CCMJ, I was sorry that my computer blew up. Problem was that it wasn't a lie. So when I finally got back on line, I posted what I knew since what I had previously posted was not updated. I once again checked with those I trusted on the board to see if an update would be appropriate and then took their wisdom and came to the consensus that posting the update and apology was of value.
I know people on here don't like bad news but that does not make it wrong to post. Or are you trying to tell me that it's okay to only post good things and not the bad so that the people on here can be manipulated? I find that hard to believe. I just can't figure out why you all ban those that are anti-a-stock and not those that give an opinion that are pro-a-stock with the same kind of fervor? It just amazes me that those that rankle the feathers of the regulars on a board get censured while the regulars are allowed to put on a board, any info they want since they control it, no matter how false that info may be. I give this as evidence. On the BLDV board, Sterlng has been allowed to post all kinds of info that isn't factualy correct but you all just let it slide on by. When it's complained about, we get told that he's not breaking any tou rules by posting what he does. So then, by the same thinking, me posting about Moaning is the same. So once again, WHAT DID I DO WRONG TO GET BANNED? MY MOANING POSTS ARE IN LINE WITH THE TOU AND THE CCMJ APOLOGY POST IS IN VIOLATION HOW SO CRITICALLY THAT IT NEEDED TO BE PULLED? It does say in the tou that common sense when deleting posts should be used but it sure don't look like it's been used here. I've got a better idea. RETURN MY LAST TWO MONTHS OF THE 3 I THAT I'VE PAID FOR AND THEN BAN ME ALL YOU WANT.
