and I take it that your posting was in response to this 'claim ' that I made in my original posting :
"even the scam accusations cannot be concluded YET in the Court of Law, so I will not be jumping the gun, so to speak"
But, you read my response to the link you provided, Right? Then are not the other sections (that S.L could have been charged with) more applicable if he was a scammer? And does being charged with a 'summary conviction' only mean the of ALL the possibilites to charge him, he was ONLY found guilty of the single section FIVE charge (which is a summary conviction) and as I mentioned in my response...It this conviction not the most MINOR of all the convictions possible , and did he not only receive the LEAST amount of disqualification time , while the other more SEVERE charges would have led to a MAX time of 15 years? Then, my point is that...IF Stephen Lumb was a SCAM ARTIST why was the court NOT able to charge him as one???Questions that we all should be thinking about...I mean, Im starting to find it more and more harder to beleive that this so called 'notorious scam artist' has evades multiple countries from being charged and labeled as one...Did you even read the link you sent me? I would LOVE to hear what others think about the points that I have raised here, as Janice has kindly brought of this issue about S.L. once again..And BTW, this claim and analysis IS very relevant to HGLC as it is possibly S.L.'s company bidding for it, then why have some of my posts been kindly deleted once again???I am very confused as to why some post freely, and provide links as well as claims and aligations, but when others disagree with a poster or their behavior, all of the sudden their postings get deleted...is this not a discussion board, so we can discuss our DD and perspective relating to our invested capital? Then, what up wit these deletions? Are we children or underage posting here or are we all adults?
-PD
