InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 1800
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/15/2008

Re: janice shell post# 5557

Sunday, 08/03/2008 11:05:29 PM

Sunday, August 03, 2008 11:05:29 PM

Post# of 34414
Ok, but when you go to this link for the reason for the disqualificaton...Why was he charged on the grounds of section 5 only (ie, summary conviction) and not section 4(fraud) or section 9(unfit to be director) or section 10(participating in wrongful trading)...and didn't S.L. say that he was left holding the bag for a particular company in the UK and was left with no paperwork or audit papers and so was caught in a mess with the regulatory body? and didnt he also say the the charge was BS and he was currently in the process of attacking the charge to get it cleared..I know several university students that have been at the wrong place at the wrong time...Do you have any PROOF that SL is a crook or do you jus have these repeat posts that dont really imply much...I could be wrong but what exactly is a summary conviction? and if he was involved in fraud, would that not have be the time to charge him? Unless he WASNT charged for fraud cause there was NO real fraud??Doesnt add up at all? Let me save you some time to extract the point of this link you provided...This ACTUALLY VERIFIED the CLAIM that S.L. is not connected to Fraud, misconduct traiding or any of the other NINE charges that he could have received, since this was a court investigation,,,and as far as I know, THIS is what a 'summary charge' is :
(taken from defencelaw.com/classification.html)


" Summary conviction offences encompass the most minor offences in the Criminal Code. Examples are "communicate for the purpose of obtaining the sexual services of a prostitute," "cause disturbance," and "harassing telephone calls."

"Unless a different penalty is specified, summary conviction offences are punishable by a fine of up to $2,000 or six months' jail or both."

"You cannot be fingerprinted for a summary conviction offence"

SOOOO, was he not given this charge after demeaning a stockholder (although the nature of this stockholder's approach is not verified or documented)..Its a no brainer that the guy has a temper (as evident from his harsh reaction to many of your approched on FFGO board)but does one having a temper mean that they are unfit to drive a company to success and push up the current PPS? Somehow, I am not convinced that your link even proved anything that wasn't already known, but good attempt though..

-PD