InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 103
Posts 13607
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/23/2004

Re: qqbmed post# 1879

Thursday, 07/24/2008 9:09:58 PM

Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:09:58 PM

Post# of 2357
qqmed,

The point I was trying to make, was that there had to be more to SEC ruling then a slap on the wrist. I know of no other circumstance where ragginbull has flat out said (to me) the USGA board will never be allow to reopen.
Do you know of any other board they done this to?

I only report to the boards what Gruber told me himself. The Board of Directors would not allow him to send out PR. His words not mind "until sign contracts in hand."

I am only trying to give a possible explanation why the lack of public information from this company is forth coming.

Remember most of their business has to do with security and military applications. Maybe their are trying to reestablish creditability by not saying anything that could be used against them. What the first thing an lawyer tell their client, "don't say anything"

If Preston gets a hold of PS, maybe he can ask him about it.

Or maybe they are just keeping a low profile until after the lawsuit, trying not to tip off TIAX of the companies progress with All Clear.

I did not like the way the first part of the suit went. I take it as a loss. Who know what rewards will be given to TIAX, maybe All Clear.

I know you been have a long time to, I know you are biting at the bit for some sight of life from this company.

I just think that pressure for information should only be applied to in house sources.

Drug

PS

qqmed, you might be right I be the first to omit I don't know.
But, I got to believe all those insiders own a heck of a lot more stock then you and me and I got to believe that they are not happy where the price of this stock is. If they had something to say that would boast the position I am sure that they wouldn't hesitate to announce it.