>DNA/Roche – I don't see the financial benefit per se.<
The economic benefits are threefold:
1. Elimination of duplicate costs. For instance, if DNA becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of Roche, it no longer needs its own staff for investor relations, Sarbox compliance, and several other functions.
2. Geographic consolidation. If the merger goes through, Roche will close its Palo Alto office and relocate the staff to DNA’s S. San Francisco campus.
3. The merger obviates the need for Roche to pay market value for the ex-US rights to DNA’s drugs beginning in 2015, when Roche’s existing opt-in arrangement expires. The current arrangement, whereby Roche gets the ex-US rights to every DNA drug at a below-market rate, has been the main source of Roche’s profitability during the past decade.
Let’s talk biotech! “The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”