Aero Performance Products Inc (fka AERP)

[fourkids_9pets]

agreed bag

---
It would seem to me that that you misplace the burden of proof.

---
again ..
as the the topic *goes round and round*
have those who've *requested the info*
called those companies *aero* views as
their competition and discovered exactly
when they did this *testing* in their
company history?

again .. let's not confuse .. time lines
and what is being accomplished .. cause
it does seem to get deliberately *blurred*

if aero had those tests done ..
we've been told the following

---
If Aero could prove that its products do IN FACT save on fuel ... that would be a Powerful Marketing Tool.

---
sure it would be .. if the supply is *smoothed* out
which of course brings us back to capital

two things immediately come to mind ..

it's contrary to everything that has been stated
about aero by these same folks since .. well ..
since i've been reading this blog

and from a logical pov .. it's knowing the process involved

obviously aero did a test that was suitable
for the patent app .. <also another topic that
goes back months>

ok .. not good enough for some but note ..
good enough for the u.s. patent office <derided>

well then <since ir answered my questions on this
self same topic months ago> i'd suggest those with
an interest contact ir ..

then .. if one understands the process of how a
company is established ..

it's pretty basic .. but time consuming

that is product ..
that is patent
that is *tweaking* product
that is establishing supply source
that is distribution channels being established
that is sales
that is new products rolled out
that is targeted marketing

now let's factor in .. the other side <re: being
a public company in today's environment>

they completed the r/m in october of 07
they have filed each of the 3 10qsb's
since they have come public
they've pr'd the app info and updated
us .. the shareholders of record re:
the otc bb ... 2 questions
again logic here folks .. if aero had
the issues some have *proclaimed* does
anyone really think .. it would only have
been 2 questions ..

so from the very start of their public life
aero has filed .. <that is money spent on
auditors and legal teams>

so .. logically <albeit mine> .. we know a
few things .. not the least of which is
aero started they meant to go along ..
with the added benefit of actually listening
to their shareholders .. when it became
pretty obvious that the *manipulation*
was rampant on the pinks ..even with being
fully sec compliant ... vicious rumors anyone

so the indy dyno test .. by logic ... most likely
will occur when .. aero .. is ready to supply the
demand the results of that test .. impact

that could be next week
that could be next month
or
that could be next year

and that is why i call ir
we know from ir .. and the pr in early feb
that aero .. did what they called a modest
test in chile re: the fleets <buses> ..

i'd say we are do for an update on that
but then imo .. we are due for all sorts of updates

now just using logic and common sense .. anyone else
think aero still has some *housekeeping* issues

that is why .. the longs are holding tight

because it's not just we know what we own
it's we are willing to give aero the time frame
required ..

---
4kids
all jmo