News Focus
News Focus
Followers 131
Posts 4727
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/10/2004

Re: GekkoTheGreat post# 53203

Wednesday, 07/09/2008 12:34:11 AM

Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:34:11 AM

Post# of 99025
You didn't even read my post, did you? Not the whole thing. No way. You could not have because there is no way to have missed my clear placement of the coding responsibilities at the feet of one John Unwin. John Unwin. John Unwin is the person specifically charged.... tasked... responsible.... accomplished.... and so forth.... with the re-write. He is not some contractor. The election of new officers at the SHM included John Unwin.... Did you notice this or not? Some contractor..... like I said, they bought his company. Weren't you paying attention? Did you both miss it when it happened and when I posted concerning it? I told you that they bought him out. He is the chief cook and bottle washer on the new and improved version that was shown off at the SHM June 12th. He and Hensel were both voted in, as a matter of fact. Contractor my ass.

And another thing; what kind of idea is this one from you: "There has been nothing from the company to back up your view". What, are you echoing my ideas now and re-branding them as criticisms? Such cunning, LOL. I told you and everyone else that this was the case. The silence from the company buttressing my notions has been deafening. The idea that there needs to be buttressing from the company.... I threw that silly idea out long ago.

So what are you doing making like my idea is weakened by there not being company reinforcement that confirms and makes credible my explanations? I could not have been more clear that what I was saying was not the least bit confirmed by the company and that the ideas were worthy of discussion and thought merely because they are interesting ideas. Its called deductive reasoning... or inductive.... or some combination thereof. Its like doing detective work and trying to unearth the real story. IMHO, my explanation works pretty well, thank you very much. Has some rough edges that need lopping off here and there, but the basic design holds together fairly well, it seems to me. Thats why I thought I'd air my thoughts on the matter. I just tire of all the shrill tripe.

So I think they got tripped up by inhouse treachery. Thats it in a nutshell.... that and the lawsuit. I think they trudged on valiantly. Personally, I'm quite impressed by evidence of grit. The explanation that pictures Paul et al as liars and incompetents and so forth just rang hollow, IMHO. If this little wildcat well comes in a dry hole, I'll at least come away knowing that I've a pretty good grasp of what actually transpired. I'm remain of the opinion this may yet come in a gusher, but we'll just have to wait and see on that score.

Meantime, everybody go back to arguing amongst yourselves. This is a wildcat well and it has a JV LOI that has to be decided upon before July 31st. In a little over 3 weeks, we should know if this is boom or bust.

Imperial Whazoo

"Just my opinions, folks. Do your own due diligence & make your own decisions. DO NOT... I repeat... DO NOT make any investment decisions on my comments. They are my opinions. That's all they are... OPINIONS."