Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,580.06
(
0.22%
)
US TECH 100
29,506.00
(
0.28%
)
Dow Jones
51,032.46
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
91.36
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
73,697.17
(
-0.08%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 49661
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Phrozt

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 36
Posts 5145
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/29/2008

Phrozt

Re: Shkinferd post# 24020

Thursday, 07/03/2008 2:53:45 PM

Thursday, July 03, 2008 2:53:45 PM

Post# of 49661
No.. it still would have been inaccurate. It didn't go anywhere close to .04 or even show that it was going to.

It's one thing to say that you predict it will go somewhere, but to blatantly lie about something that happened in the past and is recorded for all to see ( http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=GLCC&p=D&yr=0&mn=2&dy=15&i=t01089560085&r=3751 ) is incredibly inaccurate.

Clavis vitae est scientia temperata sapientia.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote