News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257269
Next 10
Followers 13
Posts 757
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/25/2003

Re: DewDiligence post# 2079

Monday, 05/03/2004 10:26:13 PM

Monday, May 03, 2004 10:26:13 PM

Post# of 257269
There were additional considerations in the Allos hearing

A yahoo poster put up this particularly insightful, IMHO, note:

http://tinyurl.com/2eotg

The short of it is that, although RSR-13 has no toxicity and could therefore be given a conditional pass, the committee did not want to do so because it would have meant that further trials would be compromised since no doctor could ethically administer a placebo in a further trial.

The breast met subgroup, taken as a separate clinical in itself, would have most likely been approved. Makes you wonder if you could use the same trial to run two or more NDA's - one for all brain cancers, one for breast->brain, one for lung->brain, etc.

I have not heard of such an approach, so there must be a regulatory, if not scientific, reason why this has not been done.

Regards,
Bob

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today