>>The SIRT premium was “only” 85% and the MLNM premium was an utterly pedestrian 50%<<
It's true the MLNM premium was only 53%, but the stock price inexplicably jumped close to 30% in the month before the acquisition was announced, so I suspect the 'effective premium' was fairly close to 100%.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.