InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 3557
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2007

Re: Netman post# 16573

Saturday, 05/24/2008 9:35:16 PM

Saturday, May 24, 2008 9:35:16 PM

Post# of 19383
Netman:

I am surprised that you would post something from company-published material like that. Not that is is wrong, quite to the contrary. In this case, in the case of uWink, I think they are actually being conservative. It is just that in general, nothing replaces original research or comparison. Reading company news , financial statements, and financial projections is misleading. They always put way too positive a spin on it. That is why a small investor must go to impartial unbiased sources for financial information, and set firm criteria for buying/selling from which he/she does not waver.

In my early years I invested in a few companies on such a basis, before I learned to be choosy (discerning). They now sit in my account untradeable, and annoying me. When I look back at some of the financial information and projections I read, it was b.s. My reasons for buying were b.s.

Let me say again, I cannot accuse uWink of that. Just a general statement. Original research, proforma calculations are lots more reliable in my view than that. Wish I could actually visit this restaurant...