Any reasons as to why GOtv was not referenced in the filing? How can a company pump a product that they do even indicate to be part of their operations going forward. Am I reading the filing wrong? If it is a shell, fine. But I don't know how they can get away with luring investors with a product that doesn't exist, nor is even referenced in their 2007 filings. I know I would not have bought into a shell above its current levels, but the CEO was interviewed and exalted the value this products was going to add. PR'd it to death, including offering the service (that according to their filings does not exist) at reduced rate. That has to be fraudulant, does it not? At any rate.... I feel their is no reason we can't go up on the shell factor alone. I just don't understand how untrue statements can go unprosecuted, when both are available via interview from the CEO and PR's.
Someone smarter than me, please tell me why I am off base.