News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122793
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: rkrw post# 62254

Saturday, 05/03/2008 6:56:44 PM

Saturday, May 03, 2008 6:56:44 PM

Post# of 257253
MNTA – You’re the only one so far who ascribes a higher valuation to case 3 than to case 2. I understand your logic: case 3 is indeterminate while case 2 arguably justifies downgrading the underlying value of MNTA’s technology.

On the other hand, case 2 allows MNTA to begin to have some money coming in from Lovenox royalties, and this has considerable value in its own right. All told, I think case 2 is better for the share price during the period in question (roughly 9-12 months from now), although one could make a case that case 3 might be better for the share price several years out.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now