News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257580
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122988
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: rkrw post# 62254

Saturday, 05/03/2008 6:56:44 PM

Saturday, May 03, 2008 6:56:44 PM

Post# of 257580
MNTA – You’re the only one so far who ascribes a higher valuation to case 3 than to case 2. I understand your logic: case 3 is indeterminate while case 2 arguably justifies downgrading the underlying value of MNTA’s technology.

On the other hand, case 2 allows MNTA to begin to have some money coming in from Lovenox royalties, and this has considerable value in its own right. All told, I think case 2 is better for the share price during the period in question (roughly 9-12 months from now), although one could make a case that case 3 might be better for the share price several years out.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today