InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,256.62
(
0.26%
)
Post# of 495952
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

seabass

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 5029
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/29/2002

seabass

Re: rollingrock post# 329363

Wednesday, 04/30/2008 3:41:16 PM

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:41:16 PM

Post# of 495952
>>>You mean "liberals" say it was an invasion. I know many people who agree with me who said it wasn't.<<<


I'm sure you do. Same people who still think Saddam Hussein took down the twin towers and still think Bush is a great president.

For the third time now: Iraq was seized by blunt military force and is now occupied by 75 US bases and 150,000 US troops in Iraqi territory. Why does this not qualify as an invasion? Because you think it was in the Iraqis best interest?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up