News Focus
News Focus
Followers 843
Posts 122817
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: palindromy post# 10338

Monday, 04/28/2008 8:15:55 AM

Monday, April 28, 2008 8:15:55 AM

Post# of 19309
Re: Pros and cons of an FDA advisory panel

>...there is potential for people to talk about goat genes invading humans etc.<

That’s why I would rather not have an advisory panel, where the mike will be open to people who want to express all kinds of wild and crazy viewpoints about transgenics.

>I still think an advisory panel is more positive than negative because of the strong data. I would think the opposite if data were weak because the usual setup for the FDA has been to murder biotechs with weak data using advisory panels.<

I disagree strongly. In general, weak data imply that you want a panel because it’s the best chance to pull a rabbit out of the hat, while strong data imply that you do not want a panel because it’s better to let sleeping dogs lie. Regards, Dew

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today