News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1
Posts 13
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/26/2002

Re: smooth2o post# 61731

Monday, 04/21/2008 12:53:37 AM

Monday, April 21, 2008 12:53:37 AM

Post# of 152300
I too wish the valuation for INTC would be better. However, when I look at the financial results over the last 10 years, it is hard to argue that Intel has been a very successful growth company over that period. Here are revenues and earnings growth over 10 years for INTC and for comparision, 2 "staid" companies (GE and Proctor and Gamble).

 
INTC GE PG
Rev 10 yrs ago 26273 99820 37154
Rev last yr 38334 169710 76476
Change over 10 years 45.91% 70.02% 105.84%

Net income 10 yrs ago 6068 9296 3780
Net income last year 6976 22468 10340
Change over 10 years 14.96% 141.70% 173.54%

Market cap 130.50 326.18 206.72
P/E 19.75 15.11 20.32

Intel management should set clear financial growth goals for itself consistent with being a growth company. Failing to meet those, it should seriously think about running the company like a cyclical company. Otellini was asked a question along these lines at the analyst meeting. His response was that he spends less than an hour a year thinking about running Intel like that.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News