Just an idea I've been pondering lately, PURE SPECULATION, IMO, JUST AN IDEA BOUNCING AROUND IN MY HEAD:
When he took over as CEO, Scott got 30 million shares, which at that time valued somewhere aroun $80k. With his previous work experience and family ties, I'm sure he has more personal money in the bank. If I was in that situation, I think I would probably stock up on at least 70 million more shares or more. If he purchased them before the CEO change announcement was made or before he officially took over, it wouldn't have shown up on the insider transaction records. Also, Scott's family would have been very informed of this company, and they have nearly bottomless pockets. My thoughts/hopes/dreams are that between Scott, his family, and his fishing buddies, they could possibly own half the shares of this company or more, which, if true, would be very very....very good for the shareholders. These guys know how to make money, and the only thing rich guys like more than 100 year old scotch and 20,000 sq ft houses, is making themselves richer. I really dont think they would pass up an investment opportunity like this unless there were legality issues. If this has been thrown out there before, sorry about the repetition, but my lurking has lapsed in the past few weeks. Just an idea, let me know your thoughts, and again ONLY AN IDEA, PURE SPECULATION, IMO. IMO. IMO.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
