LaoTsu, I regard pumping as making bold predictions without providing a rationalle for them. It seems you regard pumping as making bold predictions in the absence of certain evidences. While you have every right to disagree with my rationalle, I hope you will rethink your conclusion that I was pumping the stock. Someone asked me to explain how I could consider $1-3 "reachable". I was just answering them. It was implicit, I thought, that it would NOT do that if things didn't pan out. The question asked of me actually was in response to a post in which I said the $76 figure by another poster was not going to happen. I do believe there are scenarios however that make $1 possible this year, though much more likely a few years out.
I hope this better explains why I bothered to even talk about such outlandish share price gains..Hang in there,
BTW I gave the reason the price has REMAINED down since the convertible selling as the lack of business news. I should also have said that the selling has scared the hell out of investors who don't want to be taken to the woodshed and beat so unmercifully ever again and/or have no more money to invest in such a speculative play, and others who are afraid it could happen to them too..
ted