InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
85.43
(
0.37%
)
Bitcoin
63,333.51
(
1.06%
)
Post# of 12660
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

ragsto

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 46
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2007

ragsto

Re: rancherho post# 5675

Sunday, 04/13/2008 4:59:15 PM

Sunday, April 13, 2008 4:59:15 PM

Post# of 12660
lawsuit?

If discovery commences would not DNDN have the right to know the true share count during the class action period? If so then the SEC would/must open up and supply all shares both naked & legal for that would be the only TRUE way to find out who was actually damaged by DNDN's actions?

For if there are more shares floating around who then would be responsible for those holding shares that were NOT authorized? The SEC? I see this as a can of worms that will be stopped in its tracks. Sorry but the real cover up on why Provenge will be protected. And its not the 483 issue.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up