InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 1529
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/15/2006

Re: DewDiligence post# 5631

Friday, 04/11/2008 3:16:34 PM

Friday, April 11, 2008 3:16:34 PM

Post# of 12660
"From a patient-advocacy standpoint, surely the delay in obtaining 56 more events pales in comparison to the nightmare scenario where: a) Provenge really does have good efficacy; b) the new 9902b trial fails; and c) the old 9902b trial would have succeeded."

I agree with you. The SPA change made sense regarding the interim, to give it a better chance, however shrinking the timeline of the final by a few months to sacrifice some chances for meeting the goal was, at best, a foolish endeavor. I also agree with your previously stated opinion that the whole final change is a bit suspicious and hinting to the fact that DNDN was aiming to keep investor interest during that period of time rather than trying to help the patients...
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.