News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257264
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: drbio45 post# 1794

Tuesday, 04/13/2004 11:18:34 PM

Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:18:34 PM

Post# of 257264
More on CJC:

>> I sold the last of my cjc. The technology is great, but I think there will be some weakness until the next data set comes out in July <<

Smart move, IMHO. I think the ConjuChem situation is the mirror image of FMTI: with FMTI, investors were too negative, but with CJC they appear to be too positive.

CJC is spinning the interim results as an A or A- grade, but my assessment is B-/C+. The company concedes that nausea can be a limiting factor on dosing, and this is troubling from a competitive standpoint.

The maximum dose has been cut 20% (from 10mcg/kg to 8mcg/kg) in the next study, and it’s reasonable to assume that a lower dose will produce a somewhat shorter duration of action. If CJC’s drug has to be given more often than originally expected, how will it compete with Exenatide LAR –or even with the short-acting Exenatide?

This looks like a case where the hype may have overstepped the reality to some degree.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today