News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 1038
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/04/2006

Re: Johnberchick post# 19213

Wednesday, 04/09/2008 4:46:08 PM

Wednesday, April 09, 2008 4:46:08 PM

Post# of 22197
Intel is big-mouthing - Atom has to be significantly better than Xscale to have a chance, and I just cannot believe it can have much advantage over xscale. Remember the good-enough mp3? Well, there are mp3-pro, AAC, or even WMA which are better than mp3, but none can shake the status of mp3. How can Intel convince RIMM etc to switch? What about the costs for developing new Atom-based phones? The processor is only part of the story - even if Atom is 20% better than Xscale (computing power + energy efficient), the phone may only be 5% better - negligible.

Same thing for the HDD, SSD needs a long time to displace HDD. I say 5+ years.

I think SSD has a better shot than Atom to gain more acceptance in the next few years.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent MRVL News