News Focus
News Focus
Followers 6
Posts 784
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/10/2007

Re: vantillian post# 3888

Wednesday, 03/26/2008 5:46:27 PM

Wednesday, March 26, 2008 5:46:27 PM

Post# of 11598
"Alerted at .005. Ran to .045. 900% gain on very solid volume"

Look, I thought my deleted comments were a private exchange, but I should have looked closer. It was not my intention to spew my personal philosophy to the public.

Bottom line though....in my opinion the stock was artifically run up based on no news, and now it has fallen back and left a bunch of bagholders. To me this is akin to a pyramid scheme, or musical chairs, and I dont think its ethical (again my opinion). On top of that IHUB is loaded with newbie investors who are being preyed upon by sharks. One needs to look no further then CGGP and the "bogus" PR as a recent example. You are free to call me naive or Pollyanish for holding these opinions as from certain viewpoints it would be accurate.

I also think that the moderators should be advocates and information sources for the investors. That in my opinion would be an ethical thing to do. No where in the box does it say that 1 billion shares are coming unrestrictred at the end of year. Again just my opinion.

And finally, if one adopts the premise that a moderator should be an advocate, I dont see how anyone being paid by the company can ethically also be a moderator without a disclosure as such in the sig area of every email.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y