Good to hear from you and still keeping an eye out like yourself. Blasher could be good but Collective2's independent reporting system makes a huge difference in credibility - fudging and mis-representation of actual performance is impossible. With that said, I've added links to the following 3 C2 systems to my website ( http://tinyurl.com/3255et ).
One thing I like about these systems is that they're all reasonably priced (Main QQQQ is kind of pushing it though). I figure if a system is really making money, the creator should be making more money from trading the system itself - and not have to gouge subscribers to make money.
I agree with you regarding the large drawdowns. I don't think any of these systems consider support & resistence. Might be possible to use them with limit order entries based on SRs. That would soften the drawdowns. Might miss a few trades but could also be offset with the better entries on those trades that do execute when the limits are triggered.
Here's how these 3 systems stand as of today ...
==============================
Posted by: fast_eddie In reply to: kenwong who wrote msg# 17378 Date:3/20/2008 8:54:01 AM Post #17384 of 17384
Ken, it has been a while...
I've been following Main QQQQ also as it looks interesting. A couple disturbing points...1) rather large drawdowns during the reported trades, 2)the reported trades were relatively short term, a couple days, then the last reported trade was almost a month. No way to tell how long the currect trade is without subscribing.
I've been following Blasher's system from this link
with moderate success. It requires that you stay on top of things pretty closely while trades are open. You can also run across his posts at the Spy Technical Analysis iHub board.