News Focus
News Focus
Followers 50
Posts 5531
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2006

Re: quantumdot post# 3776

Wednesday, 03/12/2008 12:33:54 PM

Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:33:54 PM

Post# of 8474
per management the reason they didn't pursue an SPA at the outset is it woudl likely have committed them to a 2 year exposure of drug, similar to the standard set for SERMs. with the holiday periods this translates to about 2.5 years trial duration. i think rprx is going to try and argue that the standard shouldn't apply to proellex given the holiday periods and fact endometrium is refreshed, particularly if they have a couple cycles to show there is no residual drug effect on biopsies during the drug-free interval..clinically this is reasonable, but its not clear to me the FDA will allow the company to forgo this current 2 year safety requirement, but i think rprx didn't want to be backed into a corner ahead of time with an SPA, but rather come to the FDA with some reassuring biopsy data in hand to negotiate this point
just a guess..
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RPRX News