News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1
Posts 852
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2007

Re: DewDiligence post# 3440

Tuesday, 02/26/2008 6:26:01 AM

Tuesday, February 26, 2008 6:26:01 AM

Post# of 8473
<Actually, I did not specify probabilities that the IND would be accepted or rejected>

Actually, you just said the fact that they wanted a new IND was scary. So, I would place a pretty high value on the probability NON ACCEPTANCE in just that term alone. Scary, means that fear is involved and the only thing that would really HURT is if the FDA said "no". That would be the only scary scenario.

What's really comical is that you mentioned "trial design" in your first post acceptance comment on the matter, yet there hasn't been any follow up comments. Was that just because you thought it better just to leave it at a vague "trial design" comment and see what trouble that would stir up? FUD without the FUD?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RPRX News