News Focus
News Focus
Followers 5
Posts 188
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2002

Re: eik post# 2972

Thursday, 02/21/2008 2:18:27 PM

Thursday, February 21, 2008 2:18:27 PM

Post# of 5803
Now, I am confused. You said:

"I am saying that this was probably Puma’s plant."

"It definitely looks like Krong was an empty shell till 2006; acquired Roshal pile in May, 2006; changed the list of legal owners in June, 2006, and was acquired by Aurus in September, 2006."

The movie was made after Sept 06, wasn't it? So at the time of the movie, Aurus was the owner, if they owned Krong.

Your statement about being an empty shell until 2006 does not make sense to me because the tailings pile was one of the most recent acquisitions. The mining property in Siberia was already part of Aurus, but they had no funding for equipment and a work force to develop a mine. Krong gives them the revenue for mining the other properties.

Is this an exaggeration? I realize you doubt everything until proven, but do you understand why I think Aurus could be a viable company.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today