One Voice is "doing great". That is a subjective statement for sure. Why I "can't see it" probably has less to do with my conversations with company personnel (I have been in contact with Adam and Dean once each and have spoken with Rob K on two occasions) and more to do with the facts I have obtained from verifiable information sources.
There has never been a time in ONEV's history when they weren't "doing well" if that judgment was predicated solely on looking at projects they had announced in press releases. Of course when you later compare the fiscal results of the projects announced in those press releases with the fact that the company as of today is over $9 million in debt, has lost well over $52 million dollars in shareholder equity since inception and loses twice as much money as it earns, I'd have to argue "doing great" is indeed a description that currently I can't see. If everything has changed and the present MV and MCC projects do pan out as we are being led to believe they will by these press releases, it will be evident soon enough that the company is doing very well. It's just that without inside information being released to me in conversations I have had with company personnel (despite my attempts to get it), even reading all the news I can get hold of and searching the internet for One Voice coverage, there is no way to confirm some of the lofty acclaimations made daily by a few members of this board. That should explain why I as well as many other members, despite our optimism and due dilligence, "can't see" what it is one or two others claim incessently is in plain view. I'd love to know what sources of very recent information they have can be verified by means other than those I have employed i.e. talking with management, reading all pertinent boards, searching the internet for all news sources, subscribing to voice recognition industry journals and reading the company's regular government financial filings.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
