InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252782
Next 10
Followers 36
Posts 2622
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/06/2003

Re: DewDiligence post# 59138

Saturday, 02/16/2008 11:55:02 AM

Saturday, February 16, 2008 11:55:02 AM

Post# of 252782
>>I have a hard time believing that the poster in question was/is really short.

Doc has not told me he shorted MNTA. But it looked like he was saying so on the RPRX thread. I do know and like him.

He is well informed on RPRX.

His appreciation of MNTA is flawed. But I would not expect that to keep him or other hedge funds from shorting a money-burning biotech that has been rejected by the FDA and had a dead-cat bounce. That is what it looks like - however superficial that view may turn out to be.

Add to the mix that the shorts made a bundle on the stock, have reduced the shorting by millions of shares and see the opportunity to heavily short it again at a point in time where institutional holders have reduced their support. What will the price of the stock do if another 4 million shares are shorted opportunistically with no uptick rule? BS seems to support the short trade with their comments. Since no significant* news is expected in the next couple of months there is time for the shorts to develop this trade.

ij

* BTW - I do not consider the Appeal a significant news item if the lower court decision is upheld. A reversal or another new trial would be a significant negative.

There are times when rules and precedents cannot be broken; others when they cannot be adhered to with safety. (Thomas Joplin)

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.