>My point is.....we just do not know the circumstances and answers to many {most) of the issues raised on this board.<
With all due respect, this is not a constructive mindset. It is typical for retail to rationalize events by saying "we don't know *exactly* what happened."
That's just a way to signal that things didn't go as you / we were led to believe, and other than conclude that management failed to provide what they telegraphed to investors, you conclude that there are too many moving parts and therefore we can't judge.
We do know, for a certainty, that the company was just diluted 10% or so. That's a fact, and not a positive one. Therefore, the "unknowns" that led to this dilution could not have been positive ones either; in other words, management failed at some point.
If investors don't concede that simple fact, then more trouble lies ahead.