IAHL Corporation (IAHL)

[antisubmarinewarfare]

Happy Valentines Day to ALL! GO! IAHL, Thrush & PVD. ~ASW~

Comedic it is to play witness to the ongoing mindless musings of those parties among us having held through the then-ICAN/then-IBCX carnage. Those having failed themselves relative to the then-TSXT 10-bagger. Those having failed themselves relative to the recent IAHL $0.02 opportunity. Those laughably claiming to have always all the answers. And equally comedic to play witness to those parties now clamoring about "BS". Parties, themselves, once mindlessly ranting and raving about massive value/valuation influx in the absence of actual finalization/closings. About name changes. About mergers and so on. Supposed saviors on the one hand. Laughable clueless, penniless wonders. And the pot calling the kettle black on the other hand. Comedic and then some.

The primary IAHL consideration being that the lengthy negotiations stage would not have reached the definitive agreements stage had the necessary funding/financing not been in place. Had the relevant bank approvals not been received. Had the necessary growth/expansion capital not been readily at hand. With, otherwise and additionally, a need of considering the significant difference/possible difference between Thrush and Bays - Hughes management vs. ownership. Private sector companies situation. A situation not entirely clear to us as of this writing. With the case being, seemingly, that Thrush ownership, at least, is located somewhere in Atlanta. IAHL is seeking to acquire 100% of both Thrush and Bays - Hughes. There is to be no minority control/ownership when all is said and done. And, so, once Thrush and Bays - Hughes are vended in full? Well, what interest exactly would prior ownership have in either company's future? IAHL seeks to acquire in full. And additionally there's a growth/expansion capital infusion facet involved. A facet that, very seemingly, relates to the acquiring itself. And what exactly is the difference between the involved bank and the mentioned 'Investment Group'? And acquiring vs. growth/expansion capital infusion? With the bottom line being, simply enough, that in the absence of a clear distinction between management and ownership we have a situation of it being not possible to fully reconcile the overall goings-on. It simply being the case that successfully closing both pending acquisitions, as originally structured, vastly positively impacting IAHL in shareholder value terms. With us knowing, full well, that there is hugely serious managerial intent to see to it that said value, when evident, is of the tangible variety. That market level does not ongoingly reflect an egregious undervaluation situation. Eliciting a pps that ongoingly fits. Is no "joke". Company true value situation. A measure of current and future value. The effect of applicable multiples inclusive. With management clearly stating…

'Upon the closing of the above mentioned acquisitions it is the intent of IAHL to file the required documentation with the SEC so the company then will become fully reporting and move to a more recognizable trading venue.'

And...

"When the acquisition of Thrush Aircraft and Bays - Hughes Properties is completed, the companies will continue to operate independently as they are with the current management and employees in place. What IAHL will do is lend its investing and knowledge to the above mentioned companies to grow their manufacturing facilities and expand production as to better serve the global markets."

And precisely in line with what we've, so far, heard from both Larry Bays and Eric Rojek regarding Thrush moving to the 'next level'. Where IAHL does fit in. Mutual benefit. Integrity Aircraft, Inc. very much inclusive. Subsidiary-to-be. An awesome ground floor opportunity plain and simple. With the numbers to come. All of past, present and future. Value/valuation. The understandable building upon our latest PR. That, having arrived for very good reason. Lighting the necessary serious fire under market level. Long-term successful company. With it being time to get past such childishness as pure semantics. As, obviously, a reporter doing a momentary news piece on Thrush isn't going to microscopically parse the company's entire operating/ownership history but, rather, will simply summarize the situation under the current banner. Relative to the company's current corporate structure/ownership, etc. circumstance. The overall ag aircraft manufacturing reality from day one being the crux. With some of the characters routinely polluting this board being truly a "joke". And then some.

And a note…

TA numbers are not accurate. Not previously. Not currently. A situation to eventually be straightened out.

Our PR parade to very soon continue.

Green and more green on the way.