Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,473.47
(
0.37%
)
US TECH 100
28,612.40
(
0.11%
)
Dow Jones
50,579.70
(
0.58%
)
Brent Oil
101.17
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
77,249.99
(
0.31%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 99161
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

mullimatt

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 410
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/07/2007

mullimatt

Re: Sled Dog post# 44179

Friday, 02/08/2008 10:49:15 AM

Friday, February 08, 2008 10:49:15 AM

Post# of 99161
SledDog... I am beginning to agree with you...

If we can't find these 144 filings, then we have been blatently lied to.

I am also under the impression that this is pure dilution.

What really grinds my gears is the fact that SPZI should have had $500K (from Q4 2007), another $500K (Q1 2008) and another $500K (Q2 2008) from their leasing of SWARM to 141 Capital.

Instead, we as shareholders are losing money and stock value with this dilution.

Had SPZI been paid by XXIS (as per the PR), there would be no need for dilution. Yet, here we are. Something is wrong with this picture and I do not like it one bit.

Shau-dere? Shau-dere? It's "chowdah!" Say it right!

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent JPTE News
More JPTE News