>> The problem with matritech is not false positives. They have had great success at detection and false positive rates. <<
I’d be interested to know what sensitivity (true positive/[true positive+false negative]) and specificity (true positive/[true positive+false positive]) Matritech has achieved in the general population (as opposed to a high-risk pool)? T.i.a.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”