News Focus
News Focus
Followers 842
Posts 122793
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: laker9029 post# 2318

Thursday, 01/10/2008 12:17:12 PM

Thursday, January 10, 2008 12:17:12 PM

Post# of 3757
>what $ magnitude of [HIV] partnership are we looking at, in your opinion?<

That depends on the quality of the IDX899 head-to-head data vs Sustiva.

If IDX899 beats Sustiva on efficacy and resistance profile with no deficit in tolerability, a partnership will be worth very big bucks, IMO. (Sustiva sold at a $950M annualized rate during 3Q07.) If IDX899 is merely non-inferior to Sustiva in efficacy and tolerability, it may still have a place in the HIV SoC based on its higher barrier to resistance; in this case, a partnership could still be lucrative for IDIX but not to the same degree as above.

I’ll throw old some wild guesses that the first case above would be worth a $500M deal and the second case above would be worth a $150M deal. Obviously, there are shades of gray between the two cases depending on the details of the clinical results. Moreover, Sustiva could fail altogether in the phase-2 trial, although that’s not likely, IMO.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”