News Focus
News Focus
Followers 29
Posts 25865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2002

Re: mmoy post# 55087

Monday, 12/24/2007 7:49:25 PM

Monday, December 24, 2007 7:49:25 PM

Post# of 152242
Re: It must be a nuisance for AMD and distributors alike to maintain so many SKUs in a narrow price band.

And I only bothered to include the most recent parts. Many of these vendors still have a lot of legacy skus in stock, too.

By the way, did you notice the 2.8GHz Windsor 5400+ part for $99? OEMs must be dumping their excess 90nm inventory. The problem is that Newegg has it labeled as a 65nm part, but one person wrote a review saying that this is mislabeled, and in fact is only a 90nm part. This seems to make sense, in light of the 2.7GHz 5200+ being priced at $15 more.

Speaking of which, it looks like AMD's highest priced Brisbane part is now only $115. This won't get much better next quarter, even if they do manage to get speeds up to 2.9GHz. I imagine AMD will be pricing their tri-cores in the $120-180 range. Pretty gruesome for a 284mm^2 part....
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News