News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 36151
Next 10

mjk

Followers 15
Posts 1297
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2002

mjk

Member Level

Re: dieselfuel post# 14102

Tuesday, 03/09/2004 12:13:07 AM

Tuesday, March 09, 2004 12:13:07 AM

Post# of 36151
Not in this scenario, we'd spend a couple months bottoming around the 300 day, then rise back up over a few more months towards the middle of the range but not to new highs, then after one last bottom below the 300 day, take off again...this would basically start in '05. This would mean we'd be stuck in a range for months, starting from a first bottom in July. The final bottom would also get to that 1950-2000 area, then the '05 rally would be huge, another 50% min on the Nas.

This could all be invalidated tomorrow, I just haven't given up on it yet. The first bounce from the 100 day at 1991 looked fine, and so does this so far, we'd just need to bounce right around here, the 100 day again. We can break below it a bit, but I'd like a higher low than the 1991...then basically, in another week and a half to 2 weeks, we'll have taken out this morning's highs and be starting a strong rally into and thru April.

edit: I still like a bottom in July at 1955-65. So obviously, this could be proven wrong in a matter of days if this area is taken out.



Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today