MNTA: Although I am not in it for the buy-out thesis, (rather, the value proposition) I cannot fathom many scenarios where NVS shouldn't purchase MNTA outright by Fall, 2008. Further, any such scenarios imply that MNTA will perform quite well regardless:
1. M-Enox approved by FDA and is the sole generic; MNTA market cap becomes "somewhat" prohibitive for acquirer.
The acquisition possibility becomes more likely with any one or more of the below occurring by Fall 2008:
1. M-Enox approved by FDA but is 1 of 2 or 3 generics/or the application is still pending with no other generics approved.
2. M118 data comes in positive
3. Copaxone ANDA filed with FDA/EU
4. M-Enox filed with EU
In addition to MNTA's cash balance by Fall, Sandoz(NVS) owes milestones and substantial royalties/rev splits going forward. The "potential" milestone cash alone exceeds MNTA's current enterprise value.
In other words, imo, MNTA's market cap must rise... unless they fall flat on every count.
"Illegitimacy is something we should talk about in terms of not having it."
- Dan Quayle