News Focus
News Focus
Followers 3
Posts 75
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/01/2006

Re: money4retirement post# 14281

Sunday, 12/02/2007 4:19:25 PM

Sunday, December 02, 2007 4:19:25 PM

Post# of 57807
5. Tran has not bought any shares yet. He does not need to purchase 30k shares anytime soon since he has only joined COR recently. His options start at .66

8. Not to anyone's knowledge and not is any significant likeliehood.

3. Not to any noticeable degree, not worth it to speculate on that one at this time

2. RD IND, pushing ahead in europe, suspect IND submission soon after any good information percolates, optimally 1st 2 months of 08.

ps, this board is full of COR speculators, investors, faithful in the promise of ampakines. Irrational exuberance, deniro and the FAN.
Good investing, investing for the future and managing risks does not a sizeable COR holding make.
What sound data is there that a person can have in a biotech to make it a reasonable large investment for a family, very limited income streams, all future earnings are possible earnings based on research and testing of biologic-pharmacologic hypotheses in addition to competitiveness and demand if a product makes it to market.

I can state with certainty that if COR ever makes it to 5+share, the insiders will own many more shares.

If you took a lesser salary compared to your peers but had substantial options to offset the difference, it would be prudent no matter the faith in the compound to wait until it is worthwhile to use the options.
Tran has 750,000 in options for 0.66, why should he significantly reduce his current living/entertainment money when he can wait for a certain time frame and possibly make millions for those options.
As much as some posters talk about the negativity of the insider holdings, why would you buy anything but the minimum shares when you have options and significant optimism. Would you reduce your spending ability for vacations, golf, vegas when you feel your options will be worth a significant amount in the future.

Here is a different view, having a majority of insiders holding near the minimum # of shares means high likeliehod that those shareholders do not feel the options will be underwater and they have no need to purchase large amounts at these low prices to try to make up any loss of income from not utilizing their options.
If Stoll mustered a buy of 500k shares currently or other significant insiders bought very sizeable amounts, they would be gambling and stating 1. we do not think our options will ever be profitable but can make some profit from the current SP 2. we are open to being blindsided by an unforeseen event, lack of rigor and procedure in testing or undesired trial/FDA information

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today