AI
Sunday, February 29, 2004 1:35:29 AM
With Saddam now in U.S. custody, bin Laden's whereabouts are the Bush administration's most important unsolved mystery in this election year.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1556541.stm
We had bin Laden in our grasp more than two years ago at Tora Bora, but Bush held U.S. forces back and instead, called on Afghan warlords with no loyalty to our cause to finish the job.
Tora Bora is just one in a long line of graphic examples of driving terrorists, no matter what their name, from place to place.
The eastern Afghanistan intelligence chief for the country's new government, Pir Baksh Bardiwal, was astounded that the Pentagon planners of the battle for Tora Bora had failed to even consider the most obvious exit routes. He said: 'The border with Pakistan was the key, but no one paid any attention to it. And there were plenty of landing areas for helicopters had the Americans acted decisively. Al-Qa'eda escaped right out from under their feet.'..."
Daily Telegraph, 23 Feb 2002
Why? In Bush’s own words:
Our response involves far more than instant retaliation and isolated strikes. Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other we have ever seen. It may include dramatic strikes, visible on TV, and covert operations, secret even in success. We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or no rest. And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime. Bush, September 2001.
A US official said that 'casting our objectives too narrowly' risked 'a premature collapse of the international effort if by some luck chance Mr bin Laden was captured'.... "
Daily Mirror 16 November 2001
The more al-Qaeda is displaced from one country to another the more the US has a pretext for military and political action against whichever country it chooses - the last thing the CIA wants at this stage is the end of al-Qaeda. But why is the US so keen to prolong the 'War Against Terrorism' in this way.....?
http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex/Documents/WATcia-al-q.htm
#msg-1816869
But now with Saddam in U.S. custody, bin Laden's whereabouts are the Bush administration's most important unsolved mystery in this election year.
Therefore, U.S. and Pakistani forces are stepping up their hunt for Osama bin Laden, his top lieutenant and Afghanistan's former Taliban ruler, U.S. officials said this week.
http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/news/politics/8066734.htm
If bin Laden is alive this much he knows with the pending election the hunt is now serious.
Posts 1 and 2 of Correspondence were related to China’s Master Plan to Destroy America, Unrestricted Warfare, February 1999.
Excerpt: Unrestricted Warfare
Whether it be the intrusions of hackers, a major explosion at the World Trade Center, or a bombing attack by bin Laden, all of these greatly exceed the frequency band widths understood by the American military.
http://ftp.die.net/mirror/cryptome/cuw02.htm
Thus, from China, a long time supporter of al Qaeda, comes the concept for the second more deadly 9/11 attack against the United States, a major explosion at the World Trade Center, or a bombing attack by bin Laden.
Pentagon officials aboard the plane taking Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to Brussels revealed [that] large quantities of Chinese-manufactured ammunition were discovered in the Tora Bora cave hideouts of Osama bin Laden
This disclosure lends further support to earlier reports by WorldNetDaily, based in part on the intelligence sources of DEBKA-Net-Weekly, that Beijing has supported the Taliban and the al-Qaida terrorist network in various ways – including men and materiel.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25732
BIN LADEN's ONGOING CONTACT WITH CHINA— Chinese nationals visited Osama bin Laden terrorist camps in Afghanistan after a U.S. cruise-missile attack there in 1998 and paid for the right to study and remove unexploded missiles.
To go back to the fateful morning of September 11, 2001, the author Gordon Thomas says a Chinese aircraft landed in Kabul on that same day carrying a high-ranking delegation of Chinese officials who came to sign contracts to provide the Taliban authorities with state-of-the-art electronic defense equipment. It is not known whether those equipment was delivered because in October 2001 the US launched a massive military strike against Afghanistan, which overthrew the Taliban and sent Osama bin Laden and his soldiers into hiding.
If Bin Laden made it to the vast and remote area of Muslim western China he would, at least, be safe from the Americans, who would not be able to launch any military action there to catch him.
But it is unlikely that China would welcome him. The regime is worried about the prospect of an Islamic uprising among its millions of Muslim citizens. China who supports bin Laden would not welcome him for fear of an Islamic uprising but this suggests that China would be aware of Osama’s infiltration which may not be the case.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1556541.stm
Pravda asserted in 2001 that Osama bin-Laden and his closest supporters most likely hide themselves on a base in the Pamirs, in the so-called Wakhan corridor. This was reported by the Pakistani newspaper News with reference to the intelligence data. If this Pakistani report is true -- he is makin' for the border. Anyone want to consider the probabilities or potential problems with violating Chinese airspace or territory?
The Wakhan corridor is a narrow strip of land between Tajikistan and Pakistan bordering on the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region of China.
http://english.pravda.ru/hotspots/2001/10/02/16793.html
Among Osama’s plethora of projects were his agricultural holdings, which included cotton farms. Xinjiang with its large Muslim influence is the largest cotton producing area in China and borders the area where Osama was once believed to have hidden, the Whkhan corridor.
Has bin Laden now taken refuge in the vast and remote area of Muslim western China close to where he has been reported to have hidden as far back as 2001? -Am
http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache:vbKqab5vj5kJ:www.danmahony.com/binladen1.htm+bin+Laden+China&am....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1556541.stm
We had bin Laden in our grasp more than two years ago at Tora Bora, but Bush held U.S. forces back and instead, called on Afghan warlords with no loyalty to our cause to finish the job.
Tora Bora is just one in a long line of graphic examples of driving terrorists, no matter what their name, from place to place.
The eastern Afghanistan intelligence chief for the country's new government, Pir Baksh Bardiwal, was astounded that the Pentagon planners of the battle for Tora Bora had failed to even consider the most obvious exit routes. He said: 'The border with Pakistan was the key, but no one paid any attention to it. And there were plenty of landing areas for helicopters had the Americans acted decisively. Al-Qa'eda escaped right out from under their feet.'..."
Daily Telegraph, 23 Feb 2002
Why? In Bush’s own words:
Our response involves far more than instant retaliation and isolated strikes. Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other we have ever seen. It may include dramatic strikes, visible on TV, and covert operations, secret even in success. We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or no rest. And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime. Bush, September 2001.
A US official said that 'casting our objectives too narrowly' risked 'a premature collapse of the international effort if by some luck chance Mr bin Laden was captured'.... "
Daily Mirror 16 November 2001
The more al-Qaeda is displaced from one country to another the more the US has a pretext for military and political action against whichever country it chooses - the last thing the CIA wants at this stage is the end of al-Qaeda. But why is the US so keen to prolong the 'War Against Terrorism' in this way.....?
http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex/Documents/WATcia-al-q.htm
#msg-1816869
But now with Saddam in U.S. custody, bin Laden's whereabouts are the Bush administration's most important unsolved mystery in this election year.
Therefore, U.S. and Pakistani forces are stepping up their hunt for Osama bin Laden, his top lieutenant and Afghanistan's former Taliban ruler, U.S. officials said this week.
http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/news/politics/8066734.htm
If bin Laden is alive this much he knows with the pending election the hunt is now serious.
Posts 1 and 2 of Correspondence were related to China’s Master Plan to Destroy America, Unrestricted Warfare, February 1999.
Excerpt: Unrestricted Warfare
Whether it be the intrusions of hackers, a major explosion at the World Trade Center, or a bombing attack by bin Laden, all of these greatly exceed the frequency band widths understood by the American military.
http://ftp.die.net/mirror/cryptome/cuw02.htm
Thus, from China, a long time supporter of al Qaeda, comes the concept for the second more deadly 9/11 attack against the United States, a major explosion at the World Trade Center, or a bombing attack by bin Laden.
Pentagon officials aboard the plane taking Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to Brussels revealed [that] large quantities of Chinese-manufactured ammunition were discovered in the Tora Bora cave hideouts of Osama bin Laden
This disclosure lends further support to earlier reports by WorldNetDaily, based in part on the intelligence sources of DEBKA-Net-Weekly, that Beijing has supported the Taliban and the al-Qaida terrorist network in various ways – including men and materiel.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25732
BIN LADEN's ONGOING CONTACT WITH CHINA— Chinese nationals visited Osama bin Laden terrorist camps in Afghanistan after a U.S. cruise-missile attack there in 1998 and paid for the right to study and remove unexploded missiles.
To go back to the fateful morning of September 11, 2001, the author Gordon Thomas says a Chinese aircraft landed in Kabul on that same day carrying a high-ranking delegation of Chinese officials who came to sign contracts to provide the Taliban authorities with state-of-the-art electronic defense equipment. It is not known whether those equipment was delivered because in October 2001 the US launched a massive military strike against Afghanistan, which overthrew the Taliban and sent Osama bin Laden and his soldiers into hiding.
If Bin Laden made it to the vast and remote area of Muslim western China he would, at least, be safe from the Americans, who would not be able to launch any military action there to catch him.
But it is unlikely that China would welcome him. The regime is worried about the prospect of an Islamic uprising among its millions of Muslim citizens. China who supports bin Laden would not welcome him for fear of an Islamic uprising but this suggests that China would be aware of Osama’s infiltration which may not be the case.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1556541.stm
Pravda asserted in 2001 that Osama bin-Laden and his closest supporters most likely hide themselves on a base in the Pamirs, in the so-called Wakhan corridor. This was reported by the Pakistani newspaper News with reference to the intelligence data. If this Pakistani report is true -- he is makin' for the border. Anyone want to consider the probabilities or potential problems with violating Chinese airspace or territory?
The Wakhan corridor is a narrow strip of land between Tajikistan and Pakistan bordering on the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region of China.
http://english.pravda.ru/hotspots/2001/10/02/16793.html
Among Osama’s plethora of projects were his agricultural holdings, which included cotton farms. Xinjiang with its large Muslim influence is the largest cotton producing area in China and borders the area where Osama was once believed to have hidden, the Whkhan corridor.
Has bin Laden now taken refuge in the vast and remote area of Muslim western China close to where he has been reported to have hidden as far back as 2001? -Am
http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache:vbKqab5vj5kJ:www.danmahony.com/binladen1.htm+bin+Laden+China&am....
Discover What Traders Are Watching
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
