News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257287
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122810
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: croumagnon post# 54942

Sunday, 11/18/2007 2:29:34 PM

Sunday, November 18, 2007 2:29:34 PM

Post# of 257287
>PP – "Reverse merge into a corporate shell" Can you please explain what you mean here?<

I guess you haven’t read the SEC filings. In 2006, the original Pipex, which was private, merged into a company that had a public listing but no business operations. The shell company was then renamed Pipex Pharmaceuticals.

Now let me ask you a question: Why do you think Pipex wanted a public listing? Kanzer claims that the company will be “highly profitable” in 2008, so the rationale for going public via a reverse merger was presumably not to facilitate the raising of capital.

If Pipex had cutting-edge science with outstanding prospects and no need for a capital infusion, as Kanzer asserts, why didn’t the company’s owners prefer to stay private and reap 100% of the benefits for themselves?

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today