Strategy Central

[mr_cassandra]

I add improvements any time I feel the benefit the program. I keep a file for people to read at the group called ongoing programming. In the file I've tried to explain the difference between an improvement versus a disaster.

I have run into people who feel there is no change except to fix a disaster. At some point they will have to confront the real-time test, wherein I have been making program improvements all along.

I'm avoiding discussing any results before the real-time test. I feel it can and will make the same statement but will be based on publicly recorded data, rather than a backtest.