News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1
Posts 38
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/02/2007

Re: oldhamegg post# 78520

Thursday, 10/25/2007 12:05:35 AM

Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:05:35 AM

Post# of 250260
Actually, no. The language of the clause does not state a price for conversion after Oct. 1, 2007. This means one of two things. First, that there was an understanding that the shares would be converted on Oct. 1, and they were converted on that date for the set price. Second, it was an oversight--which, despite the best efforts of lawyers, happens all the time in contracts. In which case, there is no set price for conversion, and it would likely be interpreted by a court to mean market price. My guess is that the first was intended and occurred.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y