Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,816.89
(
-0.11%
)
US TECH 100
24,474.45
(
0.27%
)
Dow Jones
47,916.57
(
-0.56%
)
Brent Oil
92.41
(
-2.17%
)
Bitcoin
73,248.78
(
2.03%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 98355
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

dougSF30

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 2924
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2003

dougSF30

Re: wbmw post# 26429

Tuesday, 02/17/2004 12:49:02 PM

Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:49:02 PM

Post# of 98355
wbmw, Then why do you continue to predict "2005"? LOL.

Oh, simple. Even if Intel *knows* it is early 2005, they would say "late 2004" for strategic marketing reasons, and "slip" when the time comes.

Actually did you note the slide from HP?

It says, "64-bit OS, tools, and application development in early stages".

Now, in light of Otellini's (he does speak for Intel, right?) comments about wanting all that stuff to be done before Intel ships...

I don't think Q2 is likely. Do you?

Doug
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent AMD News
More AMD News