Regardless of gross sales, whatever they may be, it appears that they are not making it. As penny stocks go, if they don't tell you, the perception is better than reality.
LOL.. is this a way of hedging your bets?? I would say that we will find out tomorrow exactly how AERO is doing.. and has progressed over the past two years. Ths 8k will provide 2 years of audited financials and this will tell the whole story.
Regarding those who repeatedly insist that the Miller Trust "owns" the patent need to look and read the documents carefully. As has been brought out on this board, the Miller Trust brought litigation against AERO and the case was settled.. We don't know the full terms of the settlement, although it appears their name name was added (after others) to the patent as it was pledged as security for their interest in AERO. i.e. It has been pledged as collateral in the event something happens and AERO can no longer continue as a going concern. Not sure how anybody can interpret his any different as the document clearly stated "collateral".
Now, why would the Miller Trust accept the patent as collateral?? Uh, probably because they deem it to be VERY valuable.. notice that the Millers are not the only one listed on the patent. So they obviously feel quite confident about this asset, which by the way will be a critical componenet to the company's current and future success. This is VERY important to me.. after all, if the Miller's thought the business would not succeed, why would they accept the patent as collateral?? And vice versa, if they believe in the value of the patent, doesn't that say they believe in the potential of the business? OF COURSE IT DOES!!!
Also, I think it's important to note that the pledging of assets as collateral isn't new..lol..some are acting as if AERO invented this concept.. take a look at ANY of the filings for public companies and look at their "Debt" sections.. it happens ALL the time.
Anyway, tomorrow we will have all our answers and get a glimpse into the wonderful world of AERO.