News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257646
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 123026
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: DewDiligence post# 53358

Friday, 10/12/2007 2:40:18 PM

Friday, October 12, 2007 2:40:18 PM

Post# of 257646
DNA – Addendum to the addendum on Avastin for AMD:

[Reposted from #msg-23644496 on the IMCL board.]

>I personally think they made a mistake by ever allowing compounding pharmacies to aliquot Avastin [for AMD]<

Neither DNA nor the FDA has the legal authority to prevent licensed compounding pharmacies from compounding. All DNA can do is try to make it as difficult as possible.

DNA’s effort is mainly psychological, IMHO. I.e., DNA wants docs to feel guilty about producing Avastin for AMD because they are “breaking the rules.” Maybe a patient will say, “Hey, isn’t that illegal? I read something about that in the newspaper.”

When the dust settles, I think DNA’s new supply policy will have only a modest effect on the market share of Lucentis vs Avastin. The more relevant driver of market share will be the results of the NIH’s head-to-head study.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today