News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257438
Next 10
Followers 6
Posts 133
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/15/2007

Re: DewDiligence post# 53223

Friday, 10/05/2007 5:28:52 AM

Friday, October 05, 2007 5:28:52 AM

Post# of 257438
The risk at 1/10000 is on the high side for those who assume a linear model vs a linear quadratic model when extrapolating known data for instance hiroshima or chernobyl exposure. Let me put the risk in a simpler way. About 1,000 cases of cancer per year are estimated to be caused in the US a year from the total population exposure to diagnostic x rays.

One must exercise some prudence. So for example, i dont allow routine dental xrays everytime I see a dentist. On the other hand a test to diagnose, treat, or stage cancer or the high exposure during cardiac cath is well worth the risk. If a pregnacy is suspected then we get a pregnancy test before exposure.

One must also be aware of background radation. If you live in higher altitudes, travel a lot on planes, live in the radon belt or an adobe hut you get a lot more radiation from the environment. Then theres the occasional solar flare and of course your risk of skin cancer when you get a sunburn from ultraviolet radiation.




Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today