Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[plaintif2000]

do you have evidence that they CURRENTLY are not, for example
whether the trial is a hoax, the judge does not exist, that
acacia does not know who clyw is from the man in the moon?

or that Noika Siemens Networks does not exist, are not
interested in FMC, that they dont have any IMS accounts,
and that they have NOT been trialing CLYW's ASNAP technology

can you prove that the patent is of no value, can you prove
that the "re-assignment" of the patent is not a streach of
the truth

call clyw and ask them they will tell you otherwise, its
merely helping one to understand the truth behind non laymen
descriptions of expert processes and proceedures

i have no problem w/ my stance w/ clyw, and fully expect
to be proven to be correct, that ppl negative on clyw want to
say that the true answers are in my oppinion is bogus

long and strong on clyw

p2k