AI
Thursday, September 20, 2007 11:35:43 AM
What's strange about that, I have been saying it for years and against the commonly held Internet myth beliefs promoted by DeMone/chipguy and his cronies. US-IV+, Sparc64 VI, Niagara 1/2, it wasn't too difficult to work it out in advance if you didn't have an axe to grind 
.
Well , SPARC was the base and Itanium sales are variable , not the other way around.SPARC revenue has been relatively flat over the last years , while IPF is steadily growing.
What's interesting is the trend : Itaium sales pick up steam in H2.I wouldn't be surprised if this year , IPF sales will match Sparc sales in Q4.
What's more interesting are Power sales , they double in Q4 vs. Q2.Still , IPF will probably end up higher than 50% Power sales in Q4 , which is better than the 39% achieved the previous year.
. Well , SPARC was the base and Itanium sales are variable , not the other way around.SPARC revenue has been relatively flat over the last years , while IPF is steadily growing.
What's interesting is the trend : Itaium sales pick up steam in H2.I wouldn't be surprised if this year , IPF sales will match Sparc sales in Q4.
What's more interesting are Power sales , they double in Q4 vs. Q2.Still , IPF will probably end up higher than 50% Power sales in Q4 , which is better than the 39% achieved the previous year.
