News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 158
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/29/2005

Re: Ricardo Montalban post# 20579

Tuesday, 09/18/2007 1:50:03 AM

Tuesday, September 18, 2007 1:50:03 AM

Post# of 24768
I thought a few months back QCT and QTL made changes to the way they account for in house royalty transactions? If my memory is correct and this did in fact occur maybe this was done in order to eliminate the accounting need for a discount in order to compete with TXN's royalty free cross license if that was in fact the basis for them to begin with. Assuming of course that TXN was the reason what else is a company to do in order to compete with a licensee who does not pay royalties while your own chipset division does internally? Has anyone ever looked at how TXN accounts for their royalties in order to determine if the discounts were necessary from a strictly accounting point of view? If TXN does not have intra department royalties then why not argue that Q is at a cost disadvantage comparatively unless discounts are utilized? My wild guess is no Spinco-2 but rather the chipsets will all be deemed royalty free in honor or accordance with the assendence of CDMA as the dominant technology. Maybe FLO was a taste of things to come. BTW-if this was all about the accounting treatment of royalties then IMO it was a big waste of time on the part of NOK etc, unless of course some dopey regulator buys it hook line and sinker.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QCOM News